Transoral endoscopic repair of Zenker diverticulum by a thoracic surgical service.

OBJECTIVE: Zenker diverticulum (ZD), a pulsion diverticulum of the esophagus, has been traditionally managed with an open surgical approach, but endoscopic transoral stapling has been reported with increasing frequency. The objective of this study was to evaluate the results of endoscopic repair of ZD by a thoracic surgery service. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent transoral stapling repair of ZD at our institution by the thoracic surgery service. We evaluated perioperative outcomes including dysphagia (1, no dysphagia to 5, unable to swallow saliva) and failure of repair requiring surgical intervention. RESULTS: A total of 151 patients (median age, 78 years; 75 men, 76 women) underwent evaluation for endoscopic repair of ZD. Endoscopic stapled repair of the ZD was completed in 135. Sixteen patients underwent conversion to open repair. The perioperative mortality was 0.6% (1 patient). The median hospital stay was 2 days (range, 0-18 days). Complications occurred in 5 patients who underwent endoscopic repair. The mean preoperative dysphagia score was 2.8 and improved to 1.2 during follow-up (median, 16 months; P < .001). During further follow-up (median, 52 months), 8 patients (5.3%) had failure of the endoscopic repair requiring open surgery (n = 5) or redo transoral stapling (n = 3). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic stapling repair of ZD can be performed safely with good results in experienced centers by thoracic surgeons with significant esophageal experience. Long-term follow-up is required to evaluate the durability of endoscopic repair of ZD.

Castleman Disease Presenting with Pseudotumour Cerebri and Myasthenia Gravis: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Castleman disease (CD) is a rare lymphoproliferative disorder that may present with various autoimmune, inflammatory, or neurologic syndromes. This is a case of a 21-year-old woman who presented with signs and symptoms of pseudotumour cerebri (PTC) who subsequently developed myasthenia gravis (MG), and was incidentally found to have a large mass in the posterior mediastinum. Upon resection, the mass was classified as unicentric CD involved with follicular dendritic cell sarcoma. Following treatment with IVIG in the setting of progressive weakness and dyspnea, she has had complete symptom resolution while maintained on a low dose of pyridostigmine for the last two years. There are 13 cases of MG and five cases of optic disc edema described as PTC associated with CD in the literature, but to our knowledge, this is the sole case reported of the intersection of all three conditions in one patient. Increased serum levels of interleukin-6 and vascular endothelial growth factor may provide clues as to the association of CD with these neurologic syndromes.

Prospective study of quality of life after lung cancer resection.

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection with curative-intent remains the gold standard for clinically operable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This goal can be accomplished using a minimally invasive option, e.g., video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) or standard thoracotomy. Surgical techniques continue to evolve and few studies have compared the QOL of patients managed with these procedures using current approaches. The primary goal of this study was to investigate differences between patients managed surgically via VATS compared to thoracotomy with respect to ratings of chronic pain, anxiety/depression and quality of life (QOL). The secondary goal was to investigate differences between patients converted from VATS to thoracotomy versus those managed with the originally with thoracotomy. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cross sectional design study comparing the QOL after surgical resection of NSCLC. Data were obtained between 3-12 months postoperatively, from patients with potentially resectable stage I-IIIa NSCLC, who underwent a thoracotomy or VATS resection. All patients were consented. Pain was evaluated with a 0 to 10 numeric pain assessment scale (NAS), mood with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) (mood disorders) and QOL with FACT-L (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung). RESULTS: A total of 97 patients with stage I-IIIa lung cancer were enrolled; of these 66 (68%) underwent a standard thoracotomy and 31 (32%) underwent VATS resection. The preferred surgical approach was a thoracotomy for patients with stage IIIa lung cancer, or patients requiring a pneumonectomy or a bi-lobectomy. There were no significant differences between VATS and thoracotomy patients in ratings of chronic pain, mood disorders, or QOL. Conversion from VATS to thoracotomy occurred in 22 (23%) of patients. There were no significant differences between VATS conversion to thoracotomy and those with initial thoracotomy procedures in ratings of chronic pain, mood disorders, or QOL. Conversion from VATS to standard thoracotomy occurred more commonly early in the series. CONCLUSIONS: While previous studies have shown that VATS offers an early advantage with regards to perioperative outcomes, our study demonstrated that VATS and thoracotomy patients had similar late QOL outcomes.

Non-Elective Paraesophageal Hernia Repair Portends Worse Outcomes in Comparable Patients: a Propensity-Adjusted Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Patients undergoing non-elective paraesophageal hernia repair (PEHR) have worse perioperative outcomes. Because they are usually older and sicker, however, these patients may be more prone to adverse events, independent of surgical urgency. Our study aimed to determine whether non-elective PEHR is associated with differential postoperative outcome compared to elective repair, using propensity-score weighting. METHODS: We abstracted data for patients undergoing PEHR (n = 924; non-elective n = 171 (19 %); 1997-2010). Using boosted regression, we generated a propensity-weighted dataset. Odds of 30-day/in-hospital mortality and major complications after non-elective surgery were determined. RESULTS: Patients undergoing non-elective repair were significantly older, had more adverse prognostic factors, and significantly more major complications (38 versus 18 %; p < 0.001) and death (8 versus 1 %; p < 0.001). After propensity weighting, median absolute percentage bias across 28 propensity-score variables improved from 19 % (significant imbalance) to 5.6 % (well-balanced). After adjusting propensity-weighted data for age and comorbidity score, odds of major complications were still nearly two times greater (OR 1.67, CI 1.07-2.61) and mortality nearly three times greater (OR 2.74, CI 0.93-8.1) than for elective repair. CONCLUSIONS: Even after balancing significant differences in baseline characteristics, non-elective PEHR was associated with worse outcomes than elective repair. Symptomatic patients should be referred for elective repair by experienced surgeons.

Cancer Recurrence After Esophagectomy: Impact of Postoperative Infection in Propensity-Matched Cohorts.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative infection increases cancer recurrence and worsens survival in colorectal cancer, but the relationship for esophagogastric adenocarcinoma after esophagectomy is not well defined. We aimed to determine whether recurrence and survival after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophagogastric adenocarcinoma were influenced by postoperative infection using propensity-matched analysis. METHODS: We abstracted data for 810 patients (1997-2010) and defined exposure as at least 1 in-hospital or 30-day infectious complication (n = 206 [25%]). Using 29 pretreatment/intraoperative variables, patients were propensity-score matched (caliper = 0.05). Time to cancer recurrence and survival (Kaplan-Meier curves and the Breslow test), and associated factors (Cox regression with shared frailty) were assessed. RESULTS: After propensity matching (n = 167 pairs), median bias across propensity-score variables was reduced from 12.9% (p < 0.001) to 4.4% (p = 1.000). Postoperative infection was not associated with rate (n = 60 versus 63; McNemar p = 0.736) or time to recurrence in those in whom disease recurred (median, 10.7 versus 11.1 months; Wilcoxon signed-rank p = 0.455) but was associated with shorter overall survival (n = 124 versus 102 deaths; median, 26 versus 41 months; Breslow p = 0.002). After adjusting for age, body mass index, neoadjuvant therapy, sex, comorbidity score, positive resection margins, pathologic stage, R0 resection, and recurrence, postoperative infection was associated with a 44% greater hazard for death (hazard ratio, 1.44; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.89). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with esophagogastric adenocarcinoma, infections after esophagectomy were not associated with an increased rate or earlier time to recurrence when baseline characteristics associated with infection risk were balanced using propensity-score matching. Despite this, overall survival was shorter in patients with infectious complications. After adjusting for other important survival predictors, infections after esophagectomy continued to be independently associated with worse survival.

Endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy: at what level should you perform surgery?

Several interventions are possible on the sympathetic chain and the nomenclature has been confusing. The authors propose a uniform nomenclature for each procedure, mainly, sympathectomy for resection or ablation of the ganglion, sympathicotomy for the transaction of the chain, ramicotomy for the procedure preserving the chain and ganglia and severing the rami, and finally, sympathetic block for clipping above and below the ganglia. They recommend intervention on the T2 ganglia for facial hyperhidrosis and rubor, on the T3 ganglia for palmar hyperhidrosis, and on the T3 and T4 ganglia for axillary hyperhidrosis.

Predictive ability of preoperative indices for esophagectomy.

Esophageal resection remains the mainstay of treatment for early-stage cancer. In spite of recent advances, these mortality rates remain significant when compared with other major surgical procedures. Several risk scores have been reported, but few have been put to the test with adequate and objective validation studies in high volume centers. Others already in use have poor discriminatory power.